A

Lessons learnt when accounting for competing events in the external validation of time-to-event prognostic models

International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 51, pp. 615–625

Abstract

BACKGROUND: External validation of prognostic models is necessary to assess the accuracy and generalizability of the model to new patients. If models are validated in a setting in which competing events occur, these competing risks should be accounted for when comparing predicted risks to observed outcomes. METHODS: We discuss existing measures of calibration and discrimination that incorporate competing events for time-to-event models. These methods are illustrated using a clinical-data example concerning the prediction of kidney failure in a population with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), using the guideline-recommended Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE). The KFRE was developed using Cox regression in a diverse population of CKD patients and has been proposed for use in patients with advanced CKD in whom death is a frequent competing event. RESULTS: When validating the 5-year KFRE with methods that account for competing events, it becomes apparent that the 5-year KFRE considerably overestimates the real-world risk of kidney failure. The absolute overestimation was 10%age points on average and 29%age points in older high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is crucial that competing events are accounted for during external validation to provide a more reliable assessment the performance of a model in clinical settings in which competing risks occur.

Authors 8

  1. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  2. University of Leicester

    Affiliation as printed

    Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

  3. Keele University

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK

  4. Karolinska University Hospital · Karolinska Institutet

    Affiliation as printed

    Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

  5. Keele University

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK

  6. Utrecht University · University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  7. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  8. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Cited by 42 stored of 45

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 51