Intimate States
Current Anthropology, vol. 62, pp. 741–770
Abstract
Across Europe, new welfare programs exemplify attempts to govern through community. This article asks how such governing through community is done in practice. Drawing on comparative insights from fieldwork with parenting support professionals and volunteers in Amsterdam, Milan, and Paris, we document not only how governing through community is actually done but also what new forms of entanglements and unruly effects such governing creates. We argue that intimate welfare landscapes organized at the scale of the neighborhood (1) entangle welfare actors in neighborhood-focused networked relationships; (2) tend to bridge, obfuscate, and dissolve boundaries between state agent and citizen and between state and society; and (3) rely heavily on affective labor and personalized relationships. We show that the reorganization of governance through neighborhood-based networks produces an unwieldy quagmire of networks and partnerships. Moreover, rather than creating self-caring communities, new welfare programs primarily draw increasing numbers into governmental roles. Finally, instead of being released from its welfare and social responsibilities, locally embedded professionals turn out to be particularly effective at bringing the welfare state back in.
Authors 3
-
Anick Vollebergh Aachen Department of Cultural Anthropology and Devel-opment Sociology of Universiteit Leiden (Pieter de la Court
Leiden University · Radboud University Nijmegen
Affiliation as printed
Department of Anthropology and Development Studies of Radboud University (Postbus 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
Department of Cultural Anthropology and Devel-opment Sociology of Universiteit Leiden (Pieter de la Court, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands [
University Library Radboud University
the Institute for Management Research (Postbus 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands
-
Anouk de Koning corresponding Aachen Department of Cultural Anthropology and Devel-opment Sociology of Universiteit Leiden (Pieter de la Court
Leiden University · Radboud University Nijmegen
Affiliation as printed
Department of Anthropology and Development Studies of Radboud University (Postbus 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
Department of Cultural Anthropology and Devel-opment Sociology of Universiteit Leiden (Pieter de la Court, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands [
University Library Radboud University
the Institute for Management Research (Postbus 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands
-
Milena Marchesi Aachen Department of Cultural Anthropology and Devel-opment Sociology of Universiteit Leiden (Pieter de la Court
Leiden University · Radboud University Nijmegen
Affiliation as printed
Department of Anthropology and Development Studies of Radboud University (Postbus 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
Department of Cultural Anthropology and Devel-opment Sociology of Universiteit Leiden (Pieter de la Court, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands [
University Library Radboud University
the Institute for Management Research (Postbus 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Cited by 32 stored of 32
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).