A

Is Stance Detection Topic-Independent and Cross-topic Generalizable? -- A Reproduction Study

arXiv (Cornell University), pp. 46–56

Abstract

Cross-topic stance detection is the task to automatically detect stances (pro, against, or neutral) on unseen topics. We successfully reproduce state-of-the-art cross-topic stance detection work (Reimers et. al., 2019), and systematically analyze its reproducibility. Our attention then turns to the cross-topic aspect of this work, and the specificity of topics in terms of vocabulary and socio-cultural context. We ask: To what extent is stance detection topic-independent and generalizable across topics? We compare the model's performance on various unseen topics, and find topic (e.g. abortion, cloning), class (e.g. pro, con), and their interaction affecting the model's performance. We conclude that investigating performance on different topics, and addressing topic-specific vocabulary and context, is a future avenue for cross-topic stance detection.

Authors 4

  1. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Computation Linguistics and Text Mining Lab , Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  2. Leiden University · Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science , Leiden University

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  3. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Computation Linguistics and Text Mining Lab , Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  4. Leiden University · Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · Eindhoven University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Computation Linguistics and Text Mining Lab , Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science , Eindhoven University of Technology

    Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 26