Right ventricular remodeling and prognostic relevance after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

European Heart Journal, vol. 42

Abstract

Abstract Background ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) often involves changes in right ventricular (RV) function and size over time. However, the prognostic implications of RV remodeling after STEMI are unknown. The aim of current study was to characterize RV remodeling in post-STEMI patients and to investigate it's prognostic relevance. Methods RV remodeling in post-STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was defined by RV end-systolic area (RV ESA) change at 6 months after STEMI, compared to baseline. The optimal threshold of RV ESA change (≥40%) to define RV remodeling was derived from spline curve analysis (Figure 1A). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Long term outcomes were compared between patients with and without RV remodeling by means of a log rank test. Results A total of 2280 patients were analyzed (mean age 60±11 years, 76% male) and RV remodeling was present in 320 patients (14%). After a median follow-up of 75 months (interquartile range 50–106 months), the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization occurred in 292 patients (13%). After adjustment for various risk factors, including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), post-STEMI RV remodeling was independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (HR=1.37, 95% CI 1.00–1.87, p=0.049. Finally, patients with RV remodeling were had a significantly lower event-free survival rate compared with patients without RV remodeling during follow-up (log-rank test p=0.009) (Figure 1B). Conclusion RV post-infarct remodeling is associated with mortality and HF hospitalization, independent of RV systolic function. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. A) Spline and B) Kaplan-Meier curve

Authors 10

1. Surenjav Chimed Aachen

   Leiden University Medical Center

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (The)

2. Pieter van der Bijl Aachen

   Leiden University Medical Center

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (The)

3. Rodolfo de Paula Lustosa Aachen

   Leiden University Medical Center

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (The)

4. Kensuke Hirasawa Aachen

   Leiden University Medical Center

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (The)

5. Idit Yedidya Aachen

   Leiden University Medical Center

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (The)

6. Federico Fortuni Aachen

   Leiden University Medical Center

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (The)

7. J.M Montero Aachen

   Leiden University Medical Center

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (The)

8. Nina Ajmone Marsan Aachen

   Leiden University Medical Center

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (The)

9. Victoria Delgado Aachen

   Leiden University Medical Center

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (The)

10. Jeroen Joost Bax Aachen

    Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands (The)