The abductive research framework : application in an econometric context

RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)

Abstract

Highly innovative, ground-breaking, never-seen-before, terms that encapsulate the yardstick modern scientists have to measure against. Producing novel, counterintuitive results at a breakneck pace seems to be the current modus operandi as researchers try to outdo each other in a competition for positions, resources and prestige. The overarching research agenda, theory and proper technique take a backseat and what often prevails are shortcuts, bogus results, unethical practices. At the same time the hypothetico-deductive framework leaves no place for the unexpected, for actual ideas to develop and flourish. The furtherance of science relies on the inquisitiveness and creativity of researchers. Yet, epistemologically speaking, the aspect of how we discover hypothesis is often ignored. This is mirrored by our interaction with data, which is usually highly restricted and merely passive. The solution to our predicament can be found in Charles Peirce's abductive framework. It provides a place for the unexpected, adaptation and development of new ideas by engaging with data in a detective-like manner. The process of discovery itself becomes a principal interest providing value and credence. How abduction works in conjunction with induction and deduction, its relationship with data, benefits and hurdles are the context of this work. This thesis is based upon 4 Essays, covering the topics of recruitment process outsourcing, intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurial intentions, and unethical research practices. Each deals with a distinct kind of data and challenges, but all are undertaken with an abductive approach. They all provide interesting scientific findings, with surprising results that could only be unlocked through data immersion. Overall, this thesis highlights how we can engage with data differently, restructure our research process around discovery and how it facilitates us to show not only polished up results, but the work behind it. Changing our habits and incentivizing abductive approaches can enhance our careers, elevate our work and be part of a solution to the current dilemmas, such as the credibility crisis in scientific publishing.

Authors 1

1. Alexander Speil corresponding Aachen

   RWTH Aachen University

   Affiliation as printed

   RWTH Aachen