A

B io ‐D em , a tool to explore the relationship between biodiversity data availability and socio‐political conditions in time and space

Journal of Biogeography, vol. 48, pp. 2715–2726

Abstract

Abstract Aim Geo‐referenced species occurrence records are a prime example of biodiversity data and a cornerstone of biodiversity research. Yet, their availability depends on non‐biological factors, including the political framework in the region of collection. Here we present Bio‐Dem ( www.bio‐dem.surge.sh ), an open‐source software to explore the relationship between the availability of species occurrence records and the political framework in countries worldwide and through time. Location Global. Taxon Any. Methods Bio‐Dem accesses the number of occurrence records available from countries worldwide from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility ( www.gbif.org ) and socio‐political information from these countries from the Varieties of Democracy database ( www.v‐dem.net ) as well as information on colonial history from the Issue Correlates of War Project. Results Bio‐Dem is available as a free graphical user interface web application at www.bio‐dem.surge.sh . Through three interactive graphs, Bio‐Dem enables users to explore the relationship between species occurrence records and countries’ regime type, freedom of movement, freedom of association, gross domestic product, education length, political corruption, armed conflict and colonial history. We describe possible links of these specific political indicators with the collection and mobilization of biodiversity data. Illustrative examples and video tutorials explaining the use of Bio‐Dem are available at www.bio‐dem.surge.sh . Main conclusions Bio‐Dem provides a user‐friendly way to explore the link between socio‐political variables and the availability of species occurrence records in user‐selected taxa and geographic regions, and to generate hypotheses on their connection. We envision Bio‐Dem as a useful tool for teachers communicating the caveats of available biodiversity data, for biodiversity scientists exploring potential spatial and temporal bias in their data, and for social scientists exploring the impact of political systems on scientific data collection and biodiversity conservation.

Authors 9

  1. Leiden University · Naturalis Biodiversity Center · German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · Leipzig University

    Affiliation as printed

    German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig (iDiv), sDiv University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany

    Naturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands

    German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig (iDiv), sDiv, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

  2. University of Gothenburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Collective Action Research University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Varieties of Democracy Institute University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Centre for Collective Action Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Varieties of Democracy Institute, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

  3. University of Gothenburg · Umeå University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Integrated Science Lab Department of Physics Umeå University Umeå Sweden

    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

  4. University of Gothenburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

  5. University of Gothenburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

  6. SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · University of Fribourg · University of Gothenburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Department of Biology University of Fribourg Fribourg Switzerland

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Fribourg Switzerland

    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Fribourg, Switzerland

  7. University of Gothenburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Collective Action Research University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Centre for Collective Action Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

  8. University of Gothenburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Varieties of Democracy Institute University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Varieties of Democracy Institute, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

  9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew · University of Oxford · University of Gothenburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Department of Plant Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

    Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Richmond UK

    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, UK

Cited by 30 stored of 30

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 56