A

The case for biotechnological exceptionalism

Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, vol. 24, pp. 659–666

Abstract

Do biomedical interventions raise special moral concerns? A rising number of prominent authors claim that at least in the case of biomedical enhancement they do not. Treating biomedical enhancements different from non-biomedical ones, they claim, amounts to unjustified biomedical exceptionalism. This article vindicates the familiar thesis that biomedical enhancement raises specific concerns. Taking a close look at the argumentative strategy against biomedical exceptionalism and provides counterexamples showing that the biomedical mode of interventions raises concerns not relevant otherwise. In particular, biomedical interventions throughout raise concerns of informed consent, which only rarely turn up in comparable non-biomedical interventions.

Authors 1

  1. Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs corresponding Aachen

    RWTH Aachen University · Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Institut für Neurowissenschaften und Medizin, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Forschungszentrum Jülich, INM-8: Ethik in den Neurowissenschaften, 52425, Jülich, Germany. j.heinrichs@fz-juelich.de

    Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH), Aachen, Germany. j.heinrichs@fz-juelich.de

    Institut für Neurowissenschaften und Medizin, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Forschungszentrum Jülich, INM-8: Ethik in den Neurowissenschaften, 52425, Jülich, Germany

Cited by 2 stored of 2

2 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 17

17 results