A

Predicting early reconnection after cryoballoon ablation with procedural and biophysical parameters

Heart Rhythm O2, vol. 2, pp. 290–297

Abstract

Background Predicting early reconnection/dormant conduction (ERC) immediately after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) can avoid a waiting period with adenosine testing. Objective To identify procedural and biophysical parameters predicting ERC. Methods Consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing a first cryoballoon ablation (Arctic Front Advance) between 2014 and 2017 were included. ERC was defined as manifest or dormant pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection with adenosine 30 minutes after PVI. Time to isolation (TTI), balloon temperatures (BT), and thawing times were evaluated as potential predictors for ERC. Based on a multivariable model, cut-off-values were defined and a formula was constructed to be used in clinical practice. Results A total of 136 patients (60 ± 10 years, 96 male, 95% paroxysmal AF) were included. ERC was found in 40 (29%) patients (ERC group) and in 53 of 575 (9%) veins. Procedural and total ablation time and the number of unsuccessful freezes were significantly longer/higher in the ERC group compared to the non-ERC group (150 ± 40 vs 125 ± 34 minutes; 24 ± 5 vs 17 ± 4 minutes, and 38% vs 24%, respectively ( P = .028). Multivariable analysis showed that a higher nadir balloon temperature (hazard ratio [HR] 1.17 [1.09–1.23, P < .001), a higher number of unsuccessful freezes (HR 1.69 [1.15–2.49], P = .008) and a longer TTI (HR 1.02 [1.01–1.03], P < .001) were independently associated with ERC, leading to the following formula: 0.02 × TTI + 0.5 × number of unsuccessful freezes + 0.2 × nadir BT with a cut-off value of ≤-6.7 to refrain from a waiting period with adenosine testing. Conclusion Three easily available parameters were associated with ERC. Using these parameters during ablation can help to avoid a 30-minute waiting period and adenosine testing.

Authors 8

  1. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  2. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  3. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  4. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  5. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Bioinformatics Center of Expertise, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  6. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  7. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  8. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Cited by 8 stored of 8

8 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 25