Biventricular function in exercise during autonomic (thoracic epidural) block
European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 121, pp. 1405–1418
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blockade of cardiac sympathetic fibers by thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) was previously shown to reduce right and left ventricular systolic function and effective pulmonary arterial elastance. At conditions of constant paced heart rate, cardiac output and systemic hemodynamics were unchanged. In this study, we further investigated the effect of cardiac sympathicolysis during physical stress and increased oxygen demand. METHODS: In a cross-over design, 12 patients scheduled to undergo thoracic surgery performed dynamic ergometric exercise tests with and without TEA. Hemodynamics were monitored and biventricular function was measured by transthoracic two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography, pulsed wave Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging. RESULTS: TEA attenuated systolic RV function (TV S': - 21%, P < 0.001) and LV function (MV S': - 14%, P = 0.025), but biventricular diastolic function was not affected. HR (- 11%, P < 0.001), SVI (- 15%, P = 0.006), CI (- 21%, P < 0.001) and MAP (- 12%, P < 0.001) were decreased during TEA, but SVR was not affected. Exercise resulted in significant augmentation of systolic and diastolic biventricular function. During exercise HR, SVI, CI and MAP increased (respectively, + 86%, + 19%, + 124% and + 17%, all P < 0.001), whereas SVR decreased (- 49%, P < 0.001). No significant interactions between exercise and TEA were found, except for RPP (P = 0.024) and MV E DT (P = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Cardiac sympathetic blockade by TEA reduced LV and RV systolic function but did not significantly blunt exercise-induced increases in LV and RV function. These data indicate that additional mechanisms besides those controlled by the cardiac sympathetic nervous system are involved in the regulation of cardiac function during dynamic exercise. Trial registration Clinical trial registration: Nederlands Trial Register, NTR 4880 http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4880 .
Authors 9
-
Leiden University Medical Center
Affiliation as printed
Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. j.wink@lumc.nl
Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
-
Leiden University Medical Center
Affiliation as printed
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
-
Leiden University Medical Center
Affiliation as printed
Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Statistics Section, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
-
Leiden University Medical Center
Affiliation as printed
Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
-
Leiden University Medical Center
Affiliation as printed
Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
-
Leiden University Medical Center
Affiliation as printed
Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
-
Leiden University Medical Center
Affiliation as printed
Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
-
Leiden University Medical Center
Affiliation as printed
Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Anesthesia, University Hospitals Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
Cited by 4 stored of 4
4 results
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).