A

Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods

Quality of Life Research, vol. 30, pp. 3325–3342

Abstract

PURPOSE: This work is part of an international, interdisciplinary initiative to synthesize research on response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures. The objective is to critically examine current response shift methods. We additionally propose advancing new methods that address the limitations of extant methods. METHODS: Based on literature reviews, this critical examination comprises design-based, qualitative, individualized, and preference-based methods, latent variable models, and other statistical methods. We critically appraised their definition, operationalization, the type of response shift they can detect, whether they can adjust for and explain response shift, their assumptions, and alternative explanations. Overall limitations requiring new methods were identified. RESULTS: We examined 11 methods that aim to operationalize response shift, by assessing change in the meaning of one's self-evaluation. Six of these methods distinguish between change in observed measurements (observed change) and change in the construct that was intended to be measured (target change). The methods use either (sub)group-based or individual-level analysis, or a combination. All methods have underlying assumptions to be met and alternative explanations for the inferred response shift effects. We highlighted the need to address the interpretation of the results as response shift and proposed advancing new methods handling individual variation in change over time and multiple time points. CONCLUSION: No single response shift method is optimal; each method has strengths and limitations. Additionally, extra steps need to be taken to correctly interpret the results. Advancing new methods and conducting computer simulation studies that compare methods are recommended to move response shift research forward.

Authors 8

  1. Véronique Sebille corresponding

    Université de Tours · Inserm · methodS in Patient-centered outcomes and HEalth ResEarch · Université de Nantes · Nantes Université

    Affiliation as printed

    UMR INSERM 1246, SPHERE "methodS in Patient-Centered Outcomes and HEalth ResEarch", University of Nantes, University of Tours, Nantes, France. veronique.sebille@univ-nantes.fr

    UMR INSERM 1246, SPHERE "methodS in Patient-Centered Outcomes and HEalth ResEarch", University of Nantes, University of Tours, Nantes, France

  2. University of Manitoba

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

  3. University of Manitoba

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

  4. University of Calgary · O'Brien Institute for Public Health

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Community Health Sciences and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

  5. Emory University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA

  6. Trinity Western University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC, Canada

  7. Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · Amsterdam Public Health · Amsterdam University Medical Centers

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  8. Leiden University · Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · Amsterdam Public Health · Amsterdam University Medical Centers

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Department of Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

Cited by 49 stored of 48

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 60