A

Cell-Based Tracers as Trojan Horses for Image-Guided Surgery

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, pp. 755

Abstract

Surgeons rely almost completely on their own vision and palpation to recognize affected tissues during surgery. Consequently, they are often unable to distinguish between different cells and tissue types. This makes accurate and complete resection cumbersome. Targeted image-guided surgery (IGS) provides a solution by enabling real-time tissue recognition. Most current targeting agents (tracers) consist of antibodies or peptides equipped with a radiolabel for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) labels, or a near-infrared fluorescent (NIRF) dye. These tracers are preoperatively administered to patients, home in on targeted cells or tissues, and are visualized in the operating room via dedicated imaging systems. Instead of using these 'passive' tracers, there are other, more 'active' approaches of probe delivery conceivable by using living cells (macrophages/monocytes, neutrophils, T cells, mesenchymal stromal cells), cell(-derived) fragments (platelets, extracellular vesicles (exosomes)), and microorganisms (bacteria, viruses) or, alternatively, 'humanized' nanoparticles. Compared with current tracers, these active contrast agents might be more efficient for the specific targeting of tumors or other pathological tissues (e.g., atherosclerotic plaques). This review provides an overview of the arsenal of possibilities applicable for the concept of cell-based tracers for IGS.

Authors 11

  1. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

  2. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

  3. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

  4. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

  5. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

  6. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology, Translational Nanomaterials and Imaging Group, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

  7. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center · University of Twente

    Affiliation as printed

    Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands

    Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

  8. UniQure (Netherlands)

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Research and Development, UniQure, 1100 DA Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  9. Leiden University Medical Center · Percuros (Netherlands)

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

    Percuros B.V. Leiden, 2333 CL Leiden, The Netherlands

  10. Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine · University of Göttingen

    Affiliation as printed

    Translational Molecular Imaging, Clinic of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medicine Center Göttingen and Max-Planck-Institute for Experimental Medicine, 37075 Göttingen, Germany

  11. University of Sheffield

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Infection and Immunity, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK

Cited by 11 stored of 11

11 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 171