Three-dimensional evaluation of bracket placement accuracy and excess bonding adhesive depending on indirect bonding technique and bracket geometry: an in-vitro study
Head & Face Medicine, vol. 16, pp. 17
Abstract
Abstract Background This study aimed at comparing bracket placement and excess bonding adhesive depending on different indirect bonding (IDB) techniques and bracket geometries. Methods Four hundred eighty brackets without hook (WOH) and 360 with hook (WH) were placed on 60 plaster models. Three IDB techniques were tested: polyvinyl-siloxane vacuum-form (PVS-VF), polyvinyl-siloxane putty (PVS-putty), and translucence double-polyvinyl-siloxane (double-PVS). PVS-VF and PVS-putty were combined with chemically, and double-PVS was combined with light cured bonding adhesive. Virtual images of models before and after bracket transfer were generated, and computerized images were compared. Linear, angular deviations, and excess bonding adhesive were measured. Results Linear differences between the three groups were obtained for PVS-VF (WH: 1.08, SD 0.50 mm; WOH: 0.86, SD 0.25 mm), PVS-putty (WH: 0.73, SD 0.51 mm; WOH: 0.58, SD 0.28 mm), and double-PVS (WH: 0.65, SD 0.45 mm; WOH: 0.59, SD 0.33 mm) (P < 0.001). Hooks affected bracket placement accuracy in PVS-VF (P < 0.001) and PVS-putty (P = 0.029). Angular differences were observed for brackets WOH between the PVS-VF (0.64, SD 0.48°) and double-PVS group (0.92, SD 0.76°) (P < 0.001) and within double-PVS group (WH: 0.66, SD 0.51° vs. WOH: 0.92, SD 0.76°, P < 0.001). Highest amount of excess adhesive was obtained for PVS-putty group (WH: 6.54, SD 5.31 mm 2). Conclusions The double-PVS group revealed promising results with respect to transfer accuracy, whereas the PVS-VF group provided least excess bonding adhesive. Basically, hooks lead to lower precision and higher excess bonding adhesive. PVS trays for IDB generate high bracket placement accuracy. PVS-putty is the easiest to handle with and also the cheapest, but leads to large excess bonding adhesive, especially in combination with hooked brackets or tubes.
Authors 7
-
Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich corresponding
Affiliation as printed
Department of Orthodontics, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany. stephan.moehlhenrich@uni-wh.de
Department of Orthodontics, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany
-
RWTH Aachen University · Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Affiliation as printed
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
-
RWTH Aachen University · Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Affiliation as printed
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
-
RWTH Aachen University · Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Affiliation as printed
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
-
RWTH Aachen University · Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Affiliation as printed
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Orthodontics, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany
-
RWTH Aachen University · Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Affiliation as printed
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
Cited by 26 stored of 30
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).