A

Possessive and non-identity relations in Turkic switch-reference

Studies in Language, vol. 44, pp. 606–658

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides an overview of non-canonical patterns of switch-reference involving the converb in-(V)pin selected Turkic languages. This converb is usually described as a same-subject converb, but we show that it can conform to McKenzie’s (2012) extended definition of “same-subject” as expressing the identity of topic situations, rather than subject referents. In addition to tracking cross-clausal subject identity,-(V)pcan be used when the possessor of the subject of one clause corefers with the subject of another clause and when the events expressed by the two clauses are in a close temporal and/or causal relationship. Based on Stirling (1993) and Bárány & Nikolaeva (2019) , we argue that the role of possessors in Turkic switch-reference is captured by lexically specified conditions licensing the use of-(V)pwhen two subjects are in a possessive relation. Finally, we suggest that both types of non-canonical switch-reference can be seen as ensuring discourse continuity.

Authors 2

  1. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University

  2. SOAS University of London

    Affiliation as printed

    SOAS University of London

Cited by 2 stored of 2

2 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 102