A

Cross-scanner and cross-protocol multi-shell diffusion MRI data harmonization: Algorithms and results

NeuroImage, vol. 221, pp. 117128

Abstract

Cross-scanner and cross-protocol variability of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) data are known to be major obstacles in multi-site clinical studies since they limit the ability to aggregate dMRI data and derived measures. Computational algorithms that harmonize the data and minimize such variability are critical to reliably combine datasets acquired from different scanners and/or protocols, thus improving the statistical power and sensitivity of multi-site studies. Different computational approaches have been proposed to harmonize diffusion MRI data or remove scanner-specific differences. To date, these methods have mostly been developed for or evaluated on single b-value diffusion MRI data. In this work, we present the evaluation results of 19 algorithms that are developed to harmonize the cross-scanner and cross-protocol variability of multi-shell diffusion MRI using a benchmark database. The proposed algorithms rely on various signal representation approaches and computational tools, such as rotational invariant spherical harmonics, deep neural networks and hybrid biophysical and statistical approaches. The benchmark database consists of data acquired from the same subjects on two scanners with different maximum gradient strength (80 and 300 ​mT/m) and with two protocols. We evaluated the performance of these algorithms for mapping multi-shell diffusion MRI data across scanners and across protocols using several state-of-the-art imaging measures. The results show that data harmonization algorithms can reduce the cross-scanner and cross-protocol variabilities to a similar level as scan-rescan variability using the same scanner and protocol. In particular, the LinearRISH algorithm based on adaptive linear mapping of rotational invariant spherical harmonics features yields the lowest variability for our data in predicting the fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis (MK) and the rotationally invariant spherical harmonic (RISH) features. But other algorithms, such as DIAMOND, SHResNet, DIQT, CMResNet show further improvement in harmonizing the return-to-origin probability (RTOP). The performance of different approaches provides useful guidelines on data harmonization in future multi-site studies.

Authors 38

  1. Lipeng Ning corresponding

    Brigham and Women's Hospital · Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States. Electronic address: lning@bwh.harvard.edu

    Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

  2. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, London, United Kingdom

  3. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, London, United Kingdom

  4. University of Southern California

    Affiliation as printed

    Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States

  5. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, London, United Kingdom

  6. New York University

    Affiliation as printed

    New York University, New York, NY, United States

  7. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, London, United Kingdom

  8. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, London, United Kingdom

  9. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, London, United Kingdom

  10. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, London, United Kingdom

  11. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, London, United Kingdom

  12. Harvard University · Boston Children's Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

  13. Harvard University · Boston Children's Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

  14. Harvard University · Boston Children's Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

  15. Brigham and Women's Hospital · Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

  16. Brigham and Women's Hospital · Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

  17. Simon Koppers Aachen

    RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  18. Leon Weninger Aachen

    RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  19. Julia Ebert Aachen

    RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  20. Dorit Merhof Aachen

    RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  21. University College London · University of Southern California

    Affiliation as printed

    Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States

    University College London, London, United Kingdom

  22. King's College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

  23. King's College London · KU Leuven

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT/PSI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

    Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT/PSI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

  24. King's College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

  25. King's College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

  26. Vanderbilt University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

  27. Vanderbilt University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

  28. Vanderbilt University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

  29. Vanderbilt University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

  30. Vanderbilt University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

  31. Vanderbilt University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States; Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

    Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

    Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

  32. Eindhoven University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands

  33. Eindhoven University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands

  34. Cardiff University

    Affiliation as printed

    Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

  35. Cardiff University

    Affiliation as printed

    Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

  36. Cardiff University

    Affiliation as printed

    Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

  37. Cardiff University · Australian Catholic University

    Affiliation as printed

    Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia

    Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

    School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia

  38. Cardiff University

    Affiliation as printed

    Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

Cited by 89 stored of 89

Cited by patents worldwide 2 (Lens.org)

References 81