A

Prevention is better than cure: effects of errors on memory performance during spatial learning in healthy aging

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 33, pp. 997–1003

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthy aging is accompanied by a decline in learning ability and memory capacity. One widely-studied method to improve learning outcome is by reducing the occurrence of errors during learning (errorless learning; EL). However, there is also evidence that committing errors during learning (trial-and-error learning; TEL) may benefit memory performance. We argue that these inconsistent findings could be driven by a lack of control over the error frequency in traditional EL and TEL paradigms. AIM: This study employed a spatial learning task to study EL and TEL and to determine the impact of error frequency on memory recall in healthy older adults (OA; N = 68) and young adults (YA; N = 60). METHOD: Four groups of participants (YA-EL, YA-TEL, OA-EL, OA-TEL) were instructed to first place and memorize the locations of everyday objects in a chest of drawers presented on a computer screen, and in whom memory recall performance was later tested. In the TEL condition, the amount of errors made before the correct drawer was 'found' was predetermined, varying from 0 to 5. During the EL condition, every first attempt was correct (i.e., no errors were made). RESULTS: We found better overall performance in YA compared to OA and a beneficial effect of EL in both age groups. However, the amount of errors committed during learning did not influence accuracy of memory recall. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that elimination of errors during learning can benefit memory performance in both YA and OA compared to TEL.

Authors 5

  1. Inge Scheper corresponding

    Radboud University Nijmegen · Radboud University Medical Center · Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Internal Post 925, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. inge.scheper@radboudumc.nl

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. inge.scheper@radboudumc.nl

    Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Internal Post 925, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  2. Radboud University Nijmegen · Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour

    Affiliation as printed

    Division Diagnostics, Research, and Education, Forensic Psychiatric Center Pompestichting, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  3. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands

  4. Radboud University Nijmegen

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Psychology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Stumass, JADOS Foundation, Zwolle, The Netherlands

  5. Radboud University Nijmegen · Radboud University Medical Center · Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Internal Post 925, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Vincent Van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Venray, The Netherlands

Cited by 4 stored of 4

4 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 35