A

Plainware and Polychrome: Quantifying Perceptual Differences in Ceramic Classification Between Diverse Groups to Further a Strong Objectivity

Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, vol. 3, pp. 135–150

Abstract

A common problem when classifying archaeological objects is a potential cultural bias of the person deciding on the classification system. These are existing concerns within archaeology and anthropology and have previously been discussed as an emic/etic divide, “folk” classifications, or objective versus subjective approaches. But who gets to decide what is objective is often a subjective endeavour. To examine if and how cultural perceptions bias classification systems, we use methods from the field of cultural domain analysis to quantify differences in perception of ceramic sherds between different groups of people, specifically archaeologists and Indigenous and non-Indigenous potters. For this study, we asked participants to arrange a set of 30 archaeological sherds on a canvas, then interviewed them following each sorting exercise. A geosocial analysis of the arrangements in this pilot study suggests that there are substantial differences in the criteria by which the sherds are sorted between the groups. In particular, the arrangements by the Indigenous potters showed a greater diversity in the selection of underlying attributes. Understanding our different perceptions towards the material we use to construct history is the first step towards approaching a strong objectivity and thus a less fraught and more culturally inclusive discipline.

Authors 6

  1. Lewis Borck corresponding

    New Mexico Highlands University · University of Missouri

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Missouri Research Reactor; New Mexico Highlands University

    New Mexico Highlands University

    University of Missouri Research Reactor

  2. University of Konstanz

    Affiliation as printed

    Universität Konstanz, DE; Traditional Potter, Laguna Pueblo

    Traditional Potter, Laguna Pueblo

    Universität Konstanz, DE

  3. Affiliation as printed

    Traditional Potter, Laguna Pueblo

  4. Archaeology Southwest

    Affiliation as printed

    Archaeology Southwest

  5. ETH Zurich

    Affiliation as printed

    ETH Zürich

  6. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University

Cited by 6 stored of 6

6 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 53