Hydromechanical processes and their influence on the stimulation effected volume: observations from a decameter-scale hydraulic stimulation project
Solid Earth, vol. 11, pp. 1699–1729
Abstract
Six hydraulic shearing experiments have been conducted in the framework of the In-situ Stimulation and Circulation experiment within a decameter-scale crystalline rock volume at the Grimsel Test Site, Switzerland. During each experiment fractures associated with one out of two shear zone types were hydraulically reactivated. The two shear zone types differ in terms of tectonic genesis and architecture. An extensive monitoring system of sensors recording seismicity, pressure and strain was spatially distributed in 11 boreholes around the injection locations. As a result of the stimulation, the near-wellbore transmissivity increased up to 3 orders in magnitude. With one exception, jacking pressures were unchanged by the stimulations. Transmissivity change, jacking pressure and seismic activity were different for the two shear zone types, suggesting that the shear zone architectures govern the seismo-hydromechanical response. The elevated fracture fluid pressures associated with the stimulations propagated mostly along the stimulated shear zones. The absence of high-pressure signals away from the injection point for most experiments (except two out of six experiments) is interpreted as channelized flow within the shear zones. The observed deformation field within 15–20 m from the injection point is characterized by variable extensional and compressive strain produced by fracture normal opening and/or slip dislocation, as well as stress redistribution related to these processes. At greater distance from the injection location, strain measurements indicate a volumetric compressive zone, in which strain magnitudes decrease with increasing distance. These compressive strain signals are interpreted as a poro-elastic far-field response to the emplacement of fluid volume around the injection interval. Our hydromechanical data reveal that the overall stimulation effected volume is significantly larger than implied by the seismicity cloud and can be subdivided into a primary stimulated and secondary effected zone.
Authors 9
-
ETH Zurich · RWTH Aachen University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
Department of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, 52062, Germany
-
ETH Zurich · CSD Engineers (Switzerland)
Affiliation as printed
CSD Ingenieure, Bern, 3097, Switzerland
Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
-
ETH Zurich · Swiss Seismological Service
Affiliation as printed
Swiss Seismological Service, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, 52062, Germany
-
Affiliation as printed
CHYN, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, 2000, Switzerland
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, 52062, Germany
Cited by 35 stored of 36
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).