A

Single- versus double-bundle patellar graft insertion for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability: a systematic review of the literature

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 140, pp. 769–776

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The MPFL reconstruction is performed either via a single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB) procedure. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review comparing SB versus DB graft for recurrent patellofemoral instability, to summarize current evidence, and to clarify the role of both techniques. We focused on clinical scores, physical examination, complications, revision surgeries, and failures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In May of 2019 the main online databases were accessed. All the clinical studies treating isolated MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability through a single and/or double-bundle graft were enrolled in the present systematic review. Only articles reporting primary isolated MPFL reconstruction, reporting a minimum of 12-months follow-up were considered for inclusion. RESULTS: The scores of interest were in favour of the DB cohort: Kujala (+ 3.2, P = 0.03), Lysholm (+ 5.1, P = 0.001), Tegner (+ 0.3, P = 0.2), IKDC (+ 5.4, P = 0.01), VAS (+ 0.8, P = 0.3), ROM (+ 9.96, P = 0.04). In the DB graft, a reduction of overall complications (OR 0.59; P = 0.1), further surgeries (OR 0.64; P = 0.12) and re-dislocations (OR 0.61; P = 0.16) was observed. The SB group reported a reduction in the post-operative apprehension test (OR 2.42; P = 0.24). CONCLUSION: Current study support the use of double-bundle tendon graft for isolated MPFL reconstruction in selected patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability.

Authors 6

  1. Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Orthopaedics, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. migliorini.md@gmail.com

    Department of Orthopaedics, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany

  2. University of California, Los Angeles

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Orthopaedics, David Greffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

  3. Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cardiosurgery, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany

  4. Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Orthopaedics, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany

  5. Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Orthopaedics, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany

  6. Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Orthopaedics, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany

Cited by 30 stored of 31

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 80