Ranking hospitals: do we gain reliability by using composite rather than individual indicators?

BMJ Quality & Safety

DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007669 Full text (OA) OpenAlex

Authors 0

Author list not loaded yet.

Cited by 6 stored of 31

Reliability of data-driven versus expert-driven composite indicators in between-hospital comparisons on quality of oesophagogastric cancer surgery: a population-based retrospective cohort study
2025 BMJ Open article Health Professions Healthcare Quality and Management Open access

0

citations
Refining the Quality Indicator Set from the Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity to Ensure Usefulness in Clinical Practice
2025 Obesity Surgery article Medicine Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes Open access

0

citations
Association of modified textbook outcome and overall survival after surgery for colorectal liver metastases: A nationwide analysis
2024 European Journal of Surgical Oncology article Medicine Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments Open access

5

citations
The reliability of revision rates following primary shoulder arthroplasty as a quality indicator to rank hospital performance: a national registry analysis including 13,104 shoulders and 87 hospitals
2022 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery article Medicine Shoulder Injury and Treatment Open access

2

citations
International comparison of variation in performance between hospitals for THA and TKA: Is it even possible? A systematic review including 33 studies and 8 arthroplasty register reports
2022 EFORT Open Reviews review Medicine Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Open access

6

citations
more comprehensive evaluation of quality of care after total hip and knee arthroplasty: combining 4 indicators in an ordered composite outcome
2021 Acta Orthopaedica article Medicine Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Open access

9

citations

6 results

Ranking hospitals: do we gain reliability by using composite rather than individual indicators?

Authors 0

Cited by 6 stored of 31

References 0