December 12, 2003 article All age–depth models are wrong: but how badly? Quaternary Science Reviews DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.11.003 OpenAlex Authors 0 Author list not loaded yet. Cited by 3 stored of 348 Search Sort Most cited Newest Oldest Patent citations Title Any typearticle review book-chapter conference-paper preprint dissertation book dataset other Any fieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences Arts and Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Business, Management and Accounting Chemical Engineering Chemistry Computer Science Decision Sciences Dentistry Earth and Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics and Finance Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology and Microbiology Materials Science Mathematics Medicine Neuroscience Nursing Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Physics and Astronomy Psychology Social Sciences Veterinary Open access Sedimentology of a Late Quaternary lacustrine record from the south‐eastern Carpathian Basin 2021 Journal of Quaternary Science article Earth and Planetary Sciences Geology and Paleoclimatology Research Open access 5 citations Chronological Assessment of the Balta Alba Kurgan Loess-Paleosol Section (Romania) – A Comparative Study on Different Dating Methods for a Robust and Precise Age Model 2021 Frontiers in Earth Science article Earth and Planetary Sciences Geology and Paleoclimatology Research Open access 33 citations Smoothed millennial-scale palaeoclimatic reference data as unconventional comparison targets: Application to European loess records 2020 Scientific Reports article Earth and Planetary Sciences Geology and Paleoclimatology Research Open access 12 citations 3 results References 0